Sexual refusal
From Neoredemptive
When Paul speaks of marriage, he does not take sex for granted or treat it as unimportant. In response to an apparent Corinthian error that "[i]t is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman" (1 Corinthians 7:1), Paul provides a necessary corrective: that husbands and wives are not to use spiritual pretense to refuse each other sexual access to themselves. Indeed, the word translated "deprive" in 1 Cor 7:5 is a legal term (αποστερειτε, Strongs #650) meaning "to defraud", and the allowance for a sexual fast is given only subject to the mutual consent of the couple, and only as "a concession, not a command". In other words, no married couple should ever feel compelled to abstain from giving to one another sexually on the grounds of any Christian principle or doctrine. (See Greek/1 Corinthians 7:1-6.)
The exhortation here is rooted both in Torah law and in the illustrative role of marriage as a picture of Jesus Christ and His church.
See Also
- http://www.themarriagebed.com/pages/bible/says/1cor7.shtml
- http://www.christianitytoday.com/mp/2007/004/8.30.html
- Regarding Hebrew/Onah: http://books.google.com/books?id=0gMyPixLHU0C&pg=PA115&lpg=PA115&dq=onah&source=web&ots=Buyk_ujA5b&sig=427INCILWNL2JTG-fMgaBs4EfdQ#PPA115,M1
Categories: Ethics | Sex | Sexual Sin

